Agentic extractor comparison

Landing AI vs Reducto Pricing and Accuracy Compared

Two agentic document extractors, side by side. Both repriced in September 2026: Reducto r-1 now parses at a flat $10 per 1,000 pages, under Landing AI DPT-3 Pro, while Landing AI leads on visual grounding and has the lowest rate of the two with DPT-3 Verity for clean digital documents. Here is the full breakdown, and how to pick.

  • Every tier, both tools, in dollars
  • Free tiers compared honestly
  • Who each tool is best for
  • When to use a finished product instead
Upload a document, no signup

PDF, JPG, PNG, BMP, HEIC, TIFF

Upload a document to extract

Neither vendor publishes a head-to-head accuracy benchmark. Test both, and DocuOCR, on your own documents and compare the fields.

Encrypted in transit
US data handling
Fields, not just text
The short answer

Landing AI or Reducto, in one paragraph

Both vendors repriced in September 2026, and the price lead flipped. Reducto r-1 parses at a flat $10 per 1,000 pages, while Landing AI DPT-3 Pro, its default model, costs about $15 per 1,000 typical pages as an async job and $30 through a synchronous call, and more on pages dense with text. Landing AI keeps the lowest rate of the two with DPT-3 Verity at $5.50 as an async job, but Verity is in preview and meant for digitally created, Latin-script documents. Watch the Reducto catch: r-1 needs the V3 API, and calls that do not set settings.model to "r-1" bill legacy Parse at $15 to $30, doubled in agentic mode. Landing AI, from Andrew Ng's company, leads on visual grounding, tying each extracted field back to its spot on the page, and adds no charge for zero data retention on Gen2. Reducto counters with a chart agent for dense financial reports and Extract at $20 with parsing included. Neither publishes a benchmark that settles accuracy, so test both on your own documents. If you would rather skip the pipeline, a managed product like DocuOCR bundles extraction, validation, review and export for roughly $14 to $20 per 1,000 pages.

Side by side

Landing AI vs Reducto, feature by feature

Every figure comes from each vendor's own pricing and credit-usage docs. Landing AI figures are for a typical 4,000-character page.

Dimension Landing AI ADE Reducto
Default parse, typical page, per 1,000 pages DPT-3 Pro $15 async job, $30 synchronous r-1 $10 (batch $8)
Lowest parse rate, per 1,000 pages DPT-3 Verity $5.50 async, $11 sync (preview, digital documents) r-1 $10, or $8 in batch
If you do not pick the new model Gen1 parse $30 Legacy Parse $15 standard, $30 complex, 2x for agentic
How price is set Per page plus output characters; sync calls bill priority at 2x Flat list price per 1,000 pages per product
Structured extraction Gen2 Extract by input and output characters (typical document about 1.5 credits on standard) Extract $20, Deep Extract $40, parsing included
Free tier 1,000 credits on Explore $150 (15,000 credits), one time
Volume lever Team from $250/month, 25,000 to 200,000 credits Batch queue 20% off Parse and Extract; Growth custom
Zero data retention No extra credits on Gen2 (Gen1 +$10 per 1,000) ZDR agreement on Growth plan
Chart handling Rebuilds tables, captions figures Advanced chart agent, $0.06 per detected chart
Signature strength Visual grounding and auditability Agentic correction, enterprise accuracy
Output Markdown, JSON, grounded elements Markdown, JSON, agentic correction

See the full per-tier tables on Landing AI pricing and Reducto pricing.

Who each is for

Pick by what you are optimizing for

Choose Landing AI when

  • Your documents are clean, digital text and DPT-3 Verity at $5.50 per 1,000 pages as an async job fits.
  • Visual grounding and field-level auditability matter to your workflow.
  • You need zero data retention without a per-page surcharge.
  • A Team plan from $250 a month with unlimited users suits your team.

Choose Reducto when

  • Your documents are chart-heavy and you need the chart data digitized.
  • You want a flat $10 per 1,000 pages on r-1 that does not rise with text density.
  • You process at high volume and can use the Batch Queue discount.
  • A larger one-time free allowance ($150) suits a burst of testing.

Choose a product like DocuOCR when

  • You want the workflow built, not an API to wire up.
  • A business or ops team needs to run it the same day.
  • You need classification, validation, human review and export included.
  • One flat per-page price beats juggling credit tiers.

Frequently asked questions

Is Landing AI or Reducto cheaper?
On the default high-quality models, Reducto is now cheaper. Reducto r-1 is $10 per 1,000 pages after the September 1, 2026 repricing, while Landing AI DPT-3 Pro costs about $15 per 1,000 typical pages as an async job and $30 through a synchronous call. Landing AI has the lowest rate of the two with DPT-3 Verity at $5.50 as an async job, but Verity is in preview and built for digitally created, Latin-script text documents. Two caveats cut the other way: Reducto bills legacy Parse ($15 or $30, doubled for agentic) unless your call sets settings.model to "r-1", and Landing AI charges more for pages with more output text.
What is the difference between Landing AI and Reducto?
Both run a vision-language pass over each page and return clean markdown or structured fields. Landing AI Agentic Document Extraction, from Andrew Ng's company, emphasizes visual grounding, where every extracted element is tied back to its location on the page for auditability, and its DPT-3 generation prices each page by complexity, meaning a per-page rate plus output characters. Reducto is an enterprise-focused platform with a new r-1 parse model, an agentic correction pass and a chart agent, priced at a flat list rate per 1,000 pages for each product. Landing AI leads on grounding and on the Verity rate for clean digital documents; Reducto on a flat, predictable r-1 price and chart handling.
Is Landing AI more accurate than Reducto?
Neither publishes a head-to-head benchmark that settles it, and both market strong accuracy on complex layouts. Landing AI stresses visual grounding and auditability, which matters when you need to trace a field back to the page. Reducto stresses an agentic correction pass and chart extraction for dense financial documents. The honest answer is to run both on your own hardest documents and compare the extracted fields, because accuracy depends heavily on your specific layouts.
Why does the same page cost different amounts on Landing AI?
DPT-3 bills a per-page rate plus a rate per 1,000 output characters, and every synchronous call bills at the priority tier, which is twice the standard rate that async jobs get. A typical business page with about 4,000 characters costs $15 per 1,000 pages on DPT-3 Pro as an async job and $30 synchronously. A dense page with 8,000 output characters on Pro priority comes to $50 per 1,000 pages. Reducto r-1 is a flat $10 per 1,000 pages, so its bill does not move with text density.
Which handles charts and tables better, Landing AI or Reducto?
Reducto ships an advanced chart agent that digitizes chart data, billed at $0.06 per chart and only when a chart is detected, so it is built for chart-heavy financial reports. Landing AI rebuilds tables and captions figures within its parse and grounds each element visually. If your documents are full of charts you need as data, Reducto's chart agent is the more targeted tool; for tables and general layout with auditability, both do well and you should test on your own files.
Do Landing AI and Reducto both have a free tier?
Yes. Landing AI's pay-as-you-go Explore plan includes 1,000 free credits, which covers about 660 typical pages on DPT-3 Pro as async jobs or about 1,800 on DPT-3 Verity standard. Reducto gives $150 of usage (15,000 credits) one time at signup, about 15,000 pages on r-1. After that, Landing AI credits cost $0.01 each, or you move to the Team plan from $250 a month, and Reducto bills its list price per product.
Does zero data retention cost extra on Landing AI or Reducto?
On Landing AI, zero data retention adds no credits on the Gen2 generation, while the older Gen1 parse adds 1 credit per page ($10 per 1,000 pages). The Team plan includes ZDR and a HIPAA BAA. Reducto puts a ZDR agreement and a BAA on its custom Growth plan. If ZDR is a hard requirement at small volume, Landing AI Gen2 gets you there without a surcharge or a sales contract.
Should I use Landing AI, Reducto, or a managed product?
Landing AI and Reducto are both APIs you wire into your own pipeline, then review and correct the output yourself. A managed product such as DocuOCR bundles classification, extraction, validation, human review and export, billed per page at roughly $14 to $20 per 1,000 pages, so a business team can run it the same day without building an application around a parser. Choose an API if you want to own the pipeline, and a product if you want the workflow finished.

Compare all three on your own documents

Price and marketing claims only get you so far. Upload a document to DocuOCR, see the extracted fields, and judge the output before you build a pipeline around any parser.